According to Newton’s law of motion (force = mass x acceleration), the result is a torque that does not have any meaning, otherwise, the machine will run.
We can see that the empirical results are consistent with the theory. In recent tests, a rise in the Z movement, a fpc3 drive machine will fail, a spindle head was promoted, when it is running at a speed of more than 185 inches per minute is, is a fpc4 control it. All of the 14 American interrupts have been shown by fpc5 models. A typical observation is 14. The computer, which shows two American variants, is replaced by a computer that allows the same machine to lift the Z head to 245 inches per minute. What is the difference between fpc6 and fpc7 performance limits? This is all due to computer changes. Time changes are displayed by one computer, while the other does not show the change in time. The results show that a better computer is a much slower computer, an older fpc8 model, and its processor is slower. Various tests indicate that the original computer capability is not affected by the performance of the machine, but the consistency of the interrupt frequency may have a significant impact on performance.
How do you solve the problem? Fpc8 fpc9 machine controller
Basically, the problem can’t be attributed to fpc8, fpc9 processor or any particular brand of computer. We need to know what the core of the problem is, and the core is the fact that industrial machine controllers use consumer electronics in the form of desktop computers. Like all consumer electronics products, in a constantly changing and brand computer, and it is also subject to the standard of standards, such as the standard stipulated in the energy star 5.0 specifications is that it needs to the standard. The design of the desktop computer is guided by these standards, and its direction is very different from the real-time control of industrial machine tools.